The Production of Policy Knowledge in the United States (WP-26-11)
Taegyoon Kim, Alexander Furnas, and Dashun Wang
Policymaking relies on institutions that translate expertise into politically actionable knowledge. Yet little is known about how such knowledge is created, structured, and politically polarized, or how science shapes these processes. Using 2 million U.S. policy documents and nearly 1 million scientific citations from more than 200 think tanks and 100 government organizations (1998–2021), the authors analyze the supply side of science in policymaking: the production of policy knowledge. They find that think tanks are the dominant suppliers of science-based policy knowledge to government, but that this production has become increasingly politically polarized, driven primarily by growing insularity among left-leaning institutions. The authors further find that science appears to exert a moderating influence, as policy documents grounded in scientific evidence, especially those citing high-impact science, are less ideologically segregated and occupy more central positions in policy knowledge networks. These results reveal how scientific expertise structures and, at times, can bridge the ideological landscape of policy knowledge production. Amid rising political polarization and the growing role of science in policymaking, understanding how policy knowledge is produced and how scientific expertise shapes its ideological structure is essential to strengthening the informational foundations of democratic governance.