Search  
Northwestern
More help... IPR
You are here: IPR home page > Publications > Working Papers



Events
   Colloquia
   Policy Briefings

Research Programs

IPR Centers
   Cells to Society (C2S)
   Q-Center

Publications
   Working Papers
   Books
   Newsletters

People
   Faculty Fellows
   Faculty Associates
   Postdoctoral Fellows
   Graduate Students
   Staff
   E-mail/Phone list

Media Resources

IPR in the News
   
IPR Information
   About Us
   Contact Us
   Job Opportunities
   Directions

Affiliated Groups

Need more help?
   Site Map
   Return to Homepage


 


 

WP-03-12

Why Are Some Academic Fields Tipping Toward Female?
The Sex Composition of U.S. Fields of Doctoral Degree Receipt, 1971-1998

Paula England, Paul Allison, Su Li, Noah Mark,
Jennifer Thompson, Michelle Budig, and Han Sun

Abstract

Using data on the number of men and women receiving doctorates in all academic fields from 1971 to 1998, the authors examine changes in the sex composition of detailed fields. The women’s proportion of those receiving doctorate degrees increased dramatically from 14 to 42 percent. All fields, including the most male-intensive fields, experienced an increase in their percentages of females, but the rank-order of fields in percentages of females changed little. Thus, in some fields well over half of doctorates go to women today. The authors then consider whether men avoid entering fields after they reach a certain percentage of females, thereby exacerbating the “tipping,” meaning fields that previously had a male majority become almost exclusively female. To test this, they use a negative binomial regression model with fixed effects. The model shows that the higher the female percentage of those getting degrees in a field in a given year, the smaller the number of men that enter the field four to seven years later. The pattern resembles Schelling’s (1971, 1978) model of neighborhoods moving from a low to a very high percentage of blacks because of whites’ responses to the initial integrative moves by blacks. If men continue to react in this “woman-avoiding” way, it is unlikely that academia can move toward an integrated equilibrium, despite the fact that women’s field choices are moving in a slightly nontraditional direction. They examine trends in segregation using three indices. While indices disagree on the trend for the 1980s, they all show a decline in segregation in the 1970s, but little if any decline by the 1990s. Men’s avoidance of fields as they feminize might be impeding desegregation.

Paula England, Sociology and Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University
Paul Allison, Sociology, University of Pennsylvania
Su Li, Doctoral Student, Sociology, Northwestern University
Noah Mark, Sociology, Stanford University
Jennifer Thompson, Education Statistics Services Institute
Michelle Budig, Sociology, University of Massachusetts
Han Sun, Doctoral Student, Sociology, Northwestern University



Click on the working paper title at the top of this
page to download a free pdf of the paper.*

If You Need to Order a Hard Copy: Hard copies of IPR working papers cost $5.00 each (international orders are $10 each). We only accept checks drawn on U.S. bank and payable in U.S. funds. Checks or money orders should be made payable to Northwestern University and sent to the following address:

Publications Department - WP Orders
Institute for Policy Research
2040 Sheridan Rd., Evanston, IL 60208-4100.

For information, call 847-491-8712 or email ipr@northwestern.edu.
Please note that we do not accept credit cards.

*Adobe Acrobat Reader 5.0 (or higher) is needed to read the Acrobat pdf. If you need to install Acrobat Reader, click the button below. Once the file has downloaded onto your desktop, run it to install the reader on your hard drive.