Improving Clinical Guidelines and Decisions Under Uncertainty (WP-17-21)


WP-17-21

Charles F. Manski

This paper discusses how limited ability to assess patient risk of illness and predict treatment response may affect the welfare achieved by adherence to clinical practice guidelines and by decentralized clinical practice. Manski explains why predictive ability has been limited, calling attention to imperfections in clinical judgment and to questionable methodological practices in the research that supports evidence-based medicine. He discusses recent econometric research that can improve the ability of guideline developers and clinicians to predict patient outcomes. Recognizing that uncertainty will continue to afflict medical decision making, Manski applies basic decision theory to suggest reasonable decision criteria with well-understood welfare properties.
Charles F. Manski, Board of Trustees Professor in Economics and IPR Fellow, Northwestern University

PDF icon Download working paper PDF