|
Rebuilding America's Housing Policies
|
||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
Members of the MacArthur planning group review plans for launching a major study on housing effects on families. |
|
Many American neighborhoods continue to display evidence of the nation’s ongoing housing crisis—an abundance of for-sale and foreclosure signs. Yet these signs also point to another equally grave crisis—the lack of a coherent national housing policy, in particular for the nation’s poor.
“The current crisis has had an impact on many Americans, but those hardest hit are America’s low-income families and their children,” said IPR Faculty Fellow Thomas D. Cook, a social psychologist. “Housing policy in America has reached a crossroads, and fresh ideas are needed.”
Supported by a grant from the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, Cook has put together an interdisciplinary team comprising some of the nation’s top researchers in housing, poverty, and child development, including IPR sociologist Mary Pattillo. They will spend 18 months designing a major new longitudinal study on housing and families. If successful, the group will evolve into a new MacArthur research network that will carry out the study.
According to Cook, past housing policy has relied on a patchwork of studies where success was often measured by the number of bricks laid, the amount of mortar poured, or the number of apartments built. Past studies of housing effects have also been mainly one-dimensional, for example, assessing children in a sole area like cognitive performance or mental or physical health. The proposed study will take a broader, multidimensional perspective of how housing and the surrounding social, institutional, and family environment can affect a child’s health, education, behavior, and—most importantly—his or her life outcome.
“We hope this study will serve as the basis for a coherent, long-term federal housing policy,” Cook said, “one that will prove its worth by helping children to become productive members of society and successful parents, enabling them to bypass the all-too-frequent pitfalls of America’s disadvantaged youth—from going on welfare to becoming teenage parents or going to jail.
|
|||||||||||||||